Management assessment in private equity: does the team fit the investment thesis?

PRIVATE EQUITY · MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT · LEADERSHIP

In a private equity context, management assessment is not a general evaluation of executives. The decisive question is: does this management team fit the investment thesis, the next phase of the company and the value levers of the investment?

Precisely because CEO changes and leadership upgrades frequently occur during the holding period, it is worth assessing management quality before performance problems become visible. Current PE analyses increasingly emphasise that the quality of the CEO and executive team is a central part of the value creation logic.

Management assessment is not a personality test

A robust PE assessment should not stop at personality traits. What matters is whether an executive can create impact under the concrete conditions of the investment.

  • Which results did the person actually deliver?
  • Which changes did they decide on and implement themselves?
  • How large was the real P&L and leadership responsibility?
  • How does the person work with owners, the board and banks?
  • Can they create speed without losing the organisation and team?
  • Does their leadership style fit the next phase – not just the past?

Assessment along the investment thesis

A management team can be very well suited to a stable cash flow phase and at the same time not be sufficiently equipped for buy-and-build, internationalisation or a far-reaching performance turnaround. That is why the investment thesis should be translated into concrete leadership requirements.

Buy-and-build

What is needed is integration capability, M&A experience, clear governance and effective performance management across several business units.

Performance improvement

Relevant are execution strength, prioritisation, cost and cash discipline and the ability to push through unpopular decisions in a controlled way.

Internationalisation

Here, scalable leadership models, cultural reach, organisational build-up and experience with more complex management structures count.

Exit readiness

The focus shifts to transparency, succession capability, a robust next tier of management, institutionalised processes and a compelling equity story.

What should a PE management assessment cover?

  1. Track record: results, company phases and actual personal contribution.
  2. Fit with the investment thesis: experience with the specifically relevant value levers.
  3. Leadership architecture: division of roles between CEO, CFO, COO, CTO/CIO and the wider C-suite.
  4. Executive bandwidth: capacity and ability to lead additional transformation alongside day-to-day business.
  5. Stakeholder capability: collaboration with sponsor, board, banks, employee representatives and key partners.
  6. Succession risk: dependency on individuals and quality of the next tier of management.
  7. Leadership gaps: which roles need to be added, redesigned or replaced?

Pre-deal, 100 days or mid-hold?

The greatest benefit arises when management assessment is not understood as a one-off event. An initial leadership hypothesis can already be built before or immediately after a transaction. In the 100-day plan, it can be examined which leadership decisions have priority. At mid-hold, it should be questioned again whether the management team fits the next phase and the exit path.

In an analysis of more than 50 PE-backed B2B software companies, Spencer Stuart found that more than half of the companies examined experienced at least one CEO change during the holding period. Heidrick & Struggles also points out that formalised CEO assessments are now widespread in private equity. This underlines that leadership risk should not be treated as an exception.

Assessment and executive search should be thought of separately

An assessment should not automatically lead to a search. The goal is first a robust decision on whether the existing team can fulfil the mandate and where concrete gaps lie. Only when a role needs to be filled with a new appointee does the search begin.

For this overarching work, see my positioning under Private Equity Advisory. For formal appointments: Private Equity Executive Search, CEO Search and CFO Search.

Sources and further reading

Beitrag teilenShare this article

Über den AutorAbout the author

Gregor Ghirmay

In executive search and leadership advisory since 2014, including almost ten years at an internationally leading management and executive search consultancy, most recently at equity partner level. Today founder and owner of Gregor Ghirmay Executive Advisory, focused on CEO, CFO and executive board appointments, succession and governance across Germany, Austria and Switzerland. I take on a limited number of selected mandates personally; a first conversation is confidential and without obligation.

Zur PersonAbout · LinkedIn · XING


DACH Executive Leadership Brief

Receive new articles and the weekly Leadership Brief by email (published in German).